SanDisc SlotMusic: MItB rating = MA/SS

September 22, 2008

(Mild Ambivalence / Somewhat Skeptical)

As reported and evaluated by the NYT and SAI, SanDisc has announced SlotMusic, a DRM free (sort of), 320kbps MP3, “album” format on MicroSD cards. While I don’t think this idea sucks, it’s also not terribly exciting to me, either as a music fan, or as a member of the industry. I give it two “Mehs,” sideways.

1. DRM Free. Cool, but is it really? In the description SanDisc also mentions the capability to listen to the songs a few times for free, before “unlocking” them with money. So there is some sort of DRM (which just stands for Digital Rights Management, despite more nefarious connotations). So, these MicroSDs will definitely have some way of “managing” the content, and if that is in place, my money is on some sort of restrictions. Can we make it so that it won’t play in a SCION?

2. 320 kbps. Great, I care, but since the primary retailer who signed on is WalMart, I’m going to guess that the audience for the available catalog of Kenny Chesney and Kenny Chesney will not care, know what a “bps” is, and think my tractor is sexy. Again, it’s no harder for them to make them 320, so I’m glad they did, but is it going to matter? Meh.

3. $10-15 Pricetag. Meh. The best part about this idea is that it’s being pitched not as a replacement for CDs, but instead as an additional accessory. The MicroSDs plug right into your mobile phone, and you can use the card afterward to erase and have a memory stick. The problem with that is as an accessory, for this audience, it has a lot of what they don’t care about (See above), and not much of what they do. Ferinstance: these would be a great impulse buy for people as a $2-$5 hit-single format. People could see the kiosk in WalMart, grab the new Alien Ant Farm single, and plug it into their phone before they even got back to their black Chevy Tahoe. However, the cost of the SD card prohibits selling the item at those prices. This leads me to an idea that I would get a boner over. Plug-and-buy jukeboxes in bars. For a buck you play the song, and get the song via USB or FireWire dangle. Drunks with Bucks = Impulse Buy. Take that to your VC.


Four + 1; I told you already.

September 19, 2008

This week a bunch of Digital Yokels are hanging out in New York and talking about web 2.0. Apparently the topic they’ve discussed enough to turn it into a headline in the NYTimes is “How many web services can one person use?”.

Hey Digital Experts, I told you about a year ago.


Bandcamp, not just about flutes in vag anymore

September 17, 2008

Bandcamp launched today.

After watching the intro video, and the staff here messing around with it, we have to say that it is hands down the best music site out there. Super simple and fast loading, it allows bands to set up name-your-price downloads in any one of eight super-music-nerd to regular-iTunes formats.

It’s the best, most well executed … website that no one will ever use.

bandcamp.mu … dot em … ewe.

There are so many music sites out there, I can’t even name them all, let alone update a profile on all of them – and since Bandcamp is the new kid, I still have to be on LastFM, MySpace, Jambox, etc. etc. in case people look for my music there…


Poo Poo Economics

September 17, 2008

The first thing I ever learned about economics was that no one (and I mean no one), has any idea what’s going on. Thinking back to my first Macro Econ class in college, the first six weeks was spent learning an economic model, and then we showed up for week seven and the professor said, “okay, so that’s one theory … now we’re going to learn the exact opposite … um, it might work this way instead, we’re not really sure.”

To which I replied, “Okay, you go home, figure this whole thing out, and then come back and teach it to me. I’m going across the hall to learn how to read minds – they have that pretty well nailed.”

So, since apparently the requirement for developing a new economic model is simply literacy, and in light of the financial “experts” loaning a metric ass-ton of money to people who they knew couldn’t afford to pay them back, and are now acting all surprised and are now borrowing our money … I think I have the right to publish my own macro economic model.

Poo Poo Economics
by Anonymous Literate Dude on the Internet

The basis of the Poo Poo Economic model is, you guessed it, poop. The concept is, that unlike matter, energy, or Carrot Top, value can be created or destroyed. Marx liked to say that the addition of labor was where the value came from, and that’s fairly true, except that his definition of labor was all crapped up, and his plan on how to manage it was lacking.

The idea is that humans take in X amount of stuff (food, beer, condoms) and remove the value from them through digestion and butt-sexing, and produce the considerably less valuable bi-products of poop, pee, and baby food. Under capitalism (of which I am a fan), the idea is that for every 10 units of stuff that goes into a human, that human can add value to raw materials (soil, hopps, latex) through labor to create more units of value than they consumed. Through technology we’ve been able to increase that yield … cool.

So now we have a surplus of valuable stuff as compared with how much poop we’re making. This is a good place to be. We like that, because we can up consumption, drink more beer, make more butt-sexing, and poop all we want. Good times.

Since this is More Info Than Brains, I’m going to place blame on idiots wasting their money on the Internet for the current collapse. See, when someone blows a few hundred million of their surplus stuff on an Internet Startup, those units of stuff are converted into poop by laborers who, in most startups cases, aren’t adding any value. So, where we once had considerably more valuable stuff than poop, we now have the crap piling up like crazy, and we’re still eating more valuable stuff than we’re collectively producing.

Eventually, we drown in shit.

To solve this, the United States has to start making things. Real things, that are more valuable than whatever it was before we added our labor to them. That’s not to say that computers, and some information services aren’t value-added items, and pursuing some number of them is important. However, the amount of assumption, and careless spending on improbable value needs to be well below the more sure-value industries.

We need to get production back above consumption, and the good news is that we don’t have to consume less … we just need to produce more stuff that someone actually wants to consume.

*note: I realize this is a poop-based description of GDP, but the jackasses calculating the US GDP are the same people who loaned money sub-prime and thought it was a decent idea. I bet they also count programming a website as value added.


Zune to get new features: sippy cup, moo sounds

September 11, 2008

Adam Sohn, Microsoft’s head of PR, told Saul Hansel of the New York Times “Babies are born every day without an iPod. We will get there.”

At first this seemed a little crazy to me, as in, really, that’s their plan? Someone stood up in the board meeting and said, “I’ve solved it Bill! Check it … We can’t win right now, but there is a whole group of people who have never even heard of Apple!”

So, Bill is all, “Dude! Awesome, tell me! Tell me! Who are these cave dwelling music fans?”

“Get this … New. Born. Babies.

Perhaps they’re onto something though. Babies, these days, are hipper than ever with Yo Gabba Gabba using Mates of State, Ladytron and the Roots this year, perhaps babies are where it’s at.

williamsburg nursery

williamsburg nursery

**note: I would have posted this earlier, except I decided to photoshop a hipster baby.**


Swarm’pdate

September 8, 2008

As of this morning The Daily Swarm is back up and posting. Still not sure why they took a ten days off, but it appears coverage has not lapsed, and thank Digital Jesus for that.


Bad Idea

September 8, 2008

There is a rather lengthy editorial on Silicon Alley Insider suggesting that Payola could be the answer to Internet Radio’s financial problems.

I’ll be the first to admit, I didn’t read the whole thing. This is the Internet; why doesn’t wordpress invoke a 500 word field-limit for their users own good?

I did skim enough to make sure the author didn’t address the two most glaring problems with this idea. First and most importantly, it would eliminate the one reason why Internet radio has been able to gain users – because it’s programmed freely, and with total disregard to what a label, or Clearchannel wants you to listen to. The Music Director of each station programs music that they like, with no outside pressure that is unrelated to music quality. Hence, adding paid-placement would drive away those users, making those placements less valuable, and kapow, Internet radio is as dead as McCain’s Campaign (ZING!). Just because it’s a song, and not a commercial, does not mean people want to listen to it. After all, the radio still plays “We Are Family,” by Sister Sledge and I’d rather hear that Empire Carpet commercial, or be stabbed in eye.

Towards the end of his article, Doug says this, which sums up the fallacy:

With sponsored music as an advertising option, the large online station can afford to pay their bills while maintaining a strong listener experience.

The other idea that Doug left out of his article is that perhaps the reason Users do not equal Profit for Internet Radio is the same reason Users do not equal Profit for anyone on the Internet. Just below his article on SAI is one about a conference for executives from Social Networking sites to get together and figure out how to make money.

Users do not equal Profit.

Stop it.

(note: surprise surprise, the author Doug Perlson, owns an Internet startup TargetSpot.com


What’s up with the Swarm?

September 5, 2008

My trusted filter for Music News The Daily Swarm hasn’t been updated since August 27th, leading to the question*, “what’s up wit dat?”

Have they finally packed it in? Will other advertising-based web models see the dying online music mags as the canary in the coal mine? Will I get drunk at work for a third day in a row?

Answers and updates to follow.

*using the phrase, “leading to the question,” brings to light something that should be punishable by immediate dismissal, from living. People, learn what the phrase “begging the question,” really means and stop fucking it up. I read it in newspapers, hear it on CNN, and see it in your stupid blogs and I’ve never seen anyone use it correctly.


An Accidental Experiment

September 3, 2008

****updated****

With all the talk about Comcast adding a bandwidth cap, some of you may be asking the obvious question:

What is faster, The Internet or Airplanes?

What, am I the only one who wonders that?

Well, we’re about to find out once and for all, which is faster … um, disregarding variables like distance, size of file, connection speed, etc. because this is my blog, and my unintentional experiment, and the results will show what I want them to show, sucker.

Yesterday we completed a video project, that needed to be in Atlanta as soon as possible. While usually we send projects via FedEX, we started an FTP, assuming it would get there more quickly … right, the Internet is faster than Airplanes … right? Just in case, we sent them a backup via FedEX.

FedEX picked up our project at 600PM EDT yesterday.
We started FTP at 630PM EDT yesterday.

When I arrived at the office this morning to see the FTP was not complete, I realized that I was in the middle of a Horse vs. Steam Engine race of the future. The Internet v. Airplanes … updates to follow, but my money is on Airplanes at this point.

**UPDATE**
It’s official, as of 11:22 EDT, the FedEX has arrived and the FTP is still showing 2.3 hours remaining in transfer.

Time to get out our MATH BLAZTERS!

Given: a AT&T T1 Internet connection, under normal, everyday circumstances, not published speeds vs. FedEX Standard Overnight Service.

It took the file 17.5 hours to travel to Atlanta via Airplane, and 19.5 hours to travel via Internet.

So, over a distance of 710 miles, a 40 Gig file travels at an average speed of 40.57mph on an Airplane, while only traveling 36.41mph over the Internet.

Therefore:

For a 40 gig file, Airplanes are 4.16mph faster than Internet.